Discussion:
Multiculturalism Lays Seeds For Future Conflicts. Separatism Is The Most Humane Way To Organize The World's Peoples.
(too old to reply)
James Miller
2009-10-10 05:00:17 UTC
Permalink
Multiculturalism Lays Seeds For Future Conflicts. Separatism Is The Most
Humane Way To Organize The World's Peoples.

By James Miller

HUMANS ARE TRIBAL AND INHERENTLY SEPARATIST
Humans are innately "wired" for racial/ethnic/religious/cultural separatism.
Simply look at any large city in America... residents more often than not
self-segregate into ethnic neighborhoods. Even in multiracial cities such
as Los Angeles & New York, 92% of all marriages are same-race marriages (per
UCLA study, 2006). Visit any large shopping mall in L.A. or the NY metro
area, sit on a bench for an hour, and conduct your own survey. You'll
notice that about 90% of groups of two or more people who walk past you
consist of people from the same race. Visit any school cafeteria and you'll
witness students self-segregating based on race, ie. each ethnicity will
stake out its own lunch tables. Take a cursory look at the last 6,000 years
of human warfare. Easily 70% of all wars and other forms of violent
conflicts are rooted in one or more of the following:
racial/ethnic/religious/cultural clashes. Humanity should learn something
from the cold-hard-fact that people are tribal and they ALWAYS will be.

MULTICULTURALISM LAYS SEEDS FOR FUTURE CONFLICTS
Creating multicultural/multiracial/multiethnic societies (via immigration)
lays the seeds for future tension and eventual violent conflict. If
multiculturalism were so wonderful, wouldn't Asians seek out white or black
neighborhoods to live in? Wouldn't blacks seek out hispanic neighborhoods
to live in? Wouldn't hispanics seek out black neighborhoods? Wouldn't
Korean immigrants seek out Chinese neighborhoods? Wouldn't whites seek out
black or hispanic neighborhoods? Of course this doesn't happen. Rather,
people seek out a neighborhood inhabited by their own people (ie. same
race/ethnicity). Of course there are exceptions, but generally, people
self-segregate because they feel more comfortable amongst their own "tribe".

LIBERALS WHO PUSH MULTICULTURALISM USUALLY MEAN WELL, BUT THEY ARE NAIVE
Liberals have a utopian vision of a future world in which people will look
past racial/ethnic/religious differences, ie. everyone will "get along", war
won't occur, peace will prevail, etc. This sounds nice but it's naive. In
their quest to build this imagined utopian multicultural world, liberal
elites are actually doing the EXACT opposite - they are laying the seeds for
war and conflict within the nations they've targeted for multiculturalism.
As the violent realities of multiculturalism transpire (as they always do),
liberals then blame ethnic clashes on "racism". Liberals then embark on the
their usual "education campaign" to "teach" people to be more "tolerant".
But liberals are working against nature and therein lies their folly - you
can't unwire the innate tribal separatist nature of humans.

PRESERVE PRESENT DAY HOMOGENEOUS NATIONS WHILE ENCOURAGING SEPARATISM IN
MULTIRACIAL NATIONS
Nations which are currently ethnically homogeneous (such as Japan), should
be left alone. In fact, they should be encouraged to maintain their
homogeneous nature.
In multicultural nations, it's a more difficult situation because so much
damage has already been done. In such nations (eg. United States, UK),
public policy should be altered to encourage racial/ethnic separatism while
at the same time encouraging respect between the different "tribes" (ie.
ethnic groups) so as to avoid intergroup conflicts. Further, in the United
States, we can start by deporting all illegal aliens and their anchor babies
and stop all immigration. We should drop absurd slogans like "celebrate
diversity" and replace with something like, "separate and respectful".

Humanity must wake up to the above outlined tribal reality and work within
its constraints. Multiculturalism only leads to tension and violent
conflict within a nation.

###

For SERIOUS conservative writing visit my blog:
http://immigration-globalization.blogspot.com
DVH
2009-10-10 08:35:52 UTC
Permalink
Post by James Miller
Multiculturalism Lays Seeds For Future Conflicts. Separatism Is The Most
Humane Way To Organize The World's Peoples.
Marxists always have an itch to "organise the world's peoples".
Mike
2009-10-10 09:31:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by DVH
Multiculturalism Lays Seeds For Future Conflicts. �Separatism Is The Most
Humane Way To Organize The World's Peoples.
Marxists always have an itch to "organise the world's peoples".
Those who truly wish to preserve diversity and celebrate it are
nationalists.
Andy
2009-10-10 10:54:12 UTC
Permalink
My all time favourite politician was Gandhi. A nationalist, and openly
so. He was very opposed to the expulsion or exclusion of minority
groups from India, particularly the partition. He was very happy to
accept as Indians ALL those considered themselves to be true Indians,
including the European descended and those with roots from elsewhere
in the British Empire.

As an Indian, he knew that India was genetically and culturally
diverse and this was what made his own country the country it was. In
spite of the incredible cruelty that elements of the British state had
inflicted, he respected the many good things that the Empire had
brought, including the engineering skill and the wonderful English
language.

I'd happily call myself an English nationalist. Whilst I'm genetically
largely of the "caucasian" model , I'm more of the Southern European
or "Latino" (much like the Middle Eastern / North African) breed than
the "Nordic" types. Like many of my ethnicity close relatives range
from the blonde/blue-eyed to the coffee-skinned with curly hair. So
white is fair enough desciption, but I'm not Anglo-Saxon or
Protestant.

Many of the folks on this side of London are mixture of Irish
immigrants , Jewish merchants, Carribeans (particularly Creole
culture) and East Anglian country folk- who have generally interbred
reasonably freely- the same is starting to happen with the Bangladeshi
community- essentially what American society seems to call "Hispanic".
High church religion and Judaism are the some of the legacies of
Puritan pogroms against sections of the population - Manningtree Witch
Trials etc. Many of us would be considered "White" if we lived here,
if we lived in the southern hemisphere, "Coloured" because of our
genetic talent for getting a very heavy suntan- very personal in my
case, do have Aussie relatives, and they are actually black.

It saddens me that the wonderful and unique local culture has been
steamrollered not by immigrants, but by fat TV producers who've
decided to lump us in with the WASP culture of Bible Belt America and
Surburban Australia (both the Aussies AND the Midwest have actually
grown up themselves recently) They don't even live here, I think
they're frightened to because we're living proof that their bigotry is
irrelavent, and they could see the cultural trainwreck that is their
so-called media.

Cling to your statistics and demographics if you want. I certainly DO
defend my own people - the likes of the BNP and Islamic
"Fundementalists" are both alien cultures to me and against what the
local people stand for. Essex and East London belongs to the people of
Essex and East London , not some Aryan in-breeding cult that belongs
the in Klan-era deep south.
B. Jackson
2009-10-10 21:25:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by Andy
My all time favourite politician was Gandhi. A nationalist, and openly
so. He was very opposed to the expulsion or exclusion of minority
groups from India, particularly the partition.
But that didn't work out too well, now did it sparky (ie. Pakistan)?
Post by Andy
As an Indian, he knew that India was genetically and culturally
diverse and this was what made his own country the country it was.
It wasn't "diverse" dummy. Liberals cite the .002% of this group or .
7% of that group and then say, "its diverse". India was largely
ethnic Indians you dumbass.
Post by Andy
In spite of the incredible cruelty that elements of the British state had
inflicted, he respected the many good things that the Empire had
brought, including the engineering skill and the wonderful English
language.
Of course, because they're White.
Post by Andy
It saddens me that the wonderful and unique local culture has been
steamrollered not by immigrants, but by fat TV producers who've
decided to lump us in with the WASP culture of Bible Belt America and
Surburban Australia (both the Aussies AND the Midwest have actually
grown up themselves recently)
Ahhh... you're showing your ethnic separatism. See, told ya so.
Post by Andy
They don't even live here, I think
they're frightened to because we're living proof that their bigotry is
irrelavent, and they could see the cultural trainwreck that is their
so-called media.
The media people you speak of are overwhelmingly jews. Why don't you
name the jew? Oh, I see, you're afraid. What a pussy.
Post by Andy
Cling to your statistics and demographics if you want. I certainly DO
defend my own people - the likes of the BNP and Islamic
"Fundementalists" are both alien cultures to me and against what the
local people stand for. Essex and East London belongs to the people of
Essex and East London , not some Aryan in-breeding cult that belongs
the in Klan-era deep south.
How about you move into an All-Asian neighborhood. Go ahead, immerse
yourself in their culture. Live it. Breath it. If you're not
willing to do that, then you need to be voting BNP. Don't be a
hypocrite. Move to an all Asian neighborhood, I dare you.
Roger Dewhurst
2009-10-11 03:21:46 UTC
Permalink
Post by B. Jackson
Post by Andy
My all time favourite politician was Gandhi. A nationalist, and openly
so. He was very opposed to the expulsion or exclusion of minority
groups from India, particularly the partition.
But that didn't work out too well, now did it sparky (ie. Pakistan)?
Post by Andy
As an Indian, he knew that India was genetically and culturally
diverse and this was what made his own country the country it was.
It wasn't "diverse" dummy. Liberals cite the .002% of this group or .
7% of that group and then say, "its diverse". India was largely
ethnic Indians you dumbass.
The troubles are religious not ethnic. The Muslims and northern Hindus
are ethnically the same. They are Indo-European. In the south, Tamil
and related groups are Dravidian and Hindu. The Dravidians are actually
a blend of Australoid Veddas and Indo-Europeans. The Australoids appear
to be the first group of H sapiens to populate south and south-east Asia
and Australia.
B. Jackson
2009-10-12 17:28:33 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mike
Post by DVH
Multiculturalism Lays Seeds For Future Conflicts. Separatism Is The Most
Humane Way To Organize The World's Peoples.
Marxists always have an itch to "organise the world's peoples".
Those who truly wish to preserve diversity and celebrate it are
nationalists.
d
Beam Me Up Scotty
2009-10-10 17:12:42 UTC
Permalink
Post by DVH
Post by James Miller
Multiculturalism Lays Seeds For Future Conflicts. Separatism Is The Most
Humane Way To Organize The World's Peoples.
Marxists always have an itch to "organise the world's peoples".
And they are willing to kill millions to do it.
Andy
2009-10-10 08:46:38 UTC
Permalink
James Miller is a great example of what happens to people when they
are to stuck up and fearful to form any deep friendship. The quickest
way to become staunchly anti-racist is to have friendships. People who
have real friends will very soon realise that what people look like is
by the way. Yes, there certainly is an element of "birds of a feather
flock together, but his "flock" is not the broach church which most
families and relationship pools consist of.

Like many rightwing blogs you can see a person who's highly skeptical
or marriage, love and true friendship. Thus his loyalty is to ghosts ,
the dead as opposed to the living. His flag as opposed to his family.
A dead "God" rather than "the living word"

You can see by his articulate prose that he has a relatively high IQ.
It can also be seen that the man is a moron, because he has the
arrogance to think that the "scientific" mores of his upbringing are
superior to the will of God.

If he had friends, he'd notice he had friends of many religions,
social castes and ethnicities. What's happened his his strong desire
to fit in has brought on negative Attention Deficit Disorder - the far
worse Attention Suplus Disorder or "peer group zombie syndrome" .
Whereas attention seekers can from time to time acts like complete
prats, the attention AVOIDERS will go to extreme lengths to avoid
embarassment, which can including killing or disowning their children
because they don't fit into peer group norms.

The learning disabled can still learn. The spiritually retarded are
beyond help- you can throw them a rope but they won't jump aboard.
Zombies... simple as that.
B. Jackson
2009-10-13 17:31:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by Andy
James Miller is a great example of what happens to people when they
are to stuck up and fearful to form any deep friendship. The quickest
way to become staunchly anti-racist is to have friendships. People who
have real friends will very soon realise that what people look like is
by the way. Yes, there certainly is an element of "birds of a feather
flock together, but his "flock" is not the broach church which most
families and relationship pools consist of.
Like many rightwing blogs you can see a person who's highly skeptical
or marriage, love and true friendship. Thus his loyalty is to ghosts ,
the dead as opposed to the living. His flag as opposed to his family.
A dead "God" rather than "the living word"
You can see by his articulate prose that he has a relatively high IQ.
It can also be seen that the man is a moron, because he has the
arrogance to think that the "scientific" mores of his upbringing are
superior to the will of God.
If he had friends, he'd notice he had friends of many religions,
social castes and ethnicities. What's happened his his strong desire
to fit in has brought on negative Attention Deficit Disorder - the far
worse Attention Suplus Disorder or "peer group zombie syndrome" .
Whereas attention seekers can from time to time acts like complete
prats, the attention AVOIDERS will go to extreme lengths to avoid
embarassment, which can including killing or disowning their children
because they don't fit into peer group norms.
The learning disabled can still learn. The spiritually retarded are
beyond help- you can throw them a rope but they won't jump aboard.
Zombies... simple as that.
h

Loading...